The Sound of Prose: Omensetter’s Luck

For anyone interested in music theory in terms of form and analysis, musical syntax or the ‘sound of prose’ and how it may work closely with its more literary neighbors, there’s a great post just up at An und für sich already yielding some interesting discussion. This post (On Some Sentences of William Gass) is part of a book event on William H. Gass’s Omensetter’s Luck of which I will soon be submitting. As someone indulging in a bit of literary analysis from a music background of sorts, I’ve already found it quite interesting, and wager you will as well.

Since each of us was several, there was already quite a crowd.

The two of us wrote Anti-Oedipus together. Since each of us was several, there was already quite a crowd. Here we have made use of everything that came within range, what was closest as well as farthest away. We have assigned clever pseudonyms to prevent recognition. Why have we kept our own names? Out of habit, purely out of habit. To make ourselves unrecognizable in turn. To render imperceptible, not ourselves, but what makes us act, feel and think. Also because it’s nice to talk like everybody else, to say the sun rises, when everybody knows it’s only a manner of speaking. To reach, not the point where one no longer says I, but the point where it is no longer of any importance whether one says I. We are no longer ourselves. Each will know his own. We have been aided, inspired, multiplied. 

 

-Deleuze and Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia 

The Case For Harmony

As I was humming my typical harmonies above the melody line along to Sufjan at work the other day, I realized I really have very little grasp not on how vocal or instrumental harmony is constructed, but how it is learned: acquired, if you will. Now if you know me, you know I spend several blissful (albeit difficult) hours per week teaching young students private voice and piano. So when I say I do not understand how it is learned, let me explain.

In any singer’s intermediate level of coursework, there will come the time when a few different things should take place. They need to acquire a basic knowledge of chord structure, and preferably be able to pick out phrases on the piano. Reading introductory level music, then, also becomes a must. When one is playing two contrasting parts of a melody line together, harmony is created. If they can hear and discern the melody tones from the latter, they are learning harmony. There are also various exercises I assign my students more specifically to improve their note matching and pitch, but the ability to harmonize can also be improved through playing any note on the piano, and trying to sing typically 1.5, 2 or 5 whole steps above it, creating intervals of a minor or Major 3rd, or a perfect 5th. Now singing harmony in perfect 5ths for more than about 2 seconds will only result in parallel 5ths and I would avoid that like the plague…but I digress.

My point is, I have full faith that the majority of people with healthy vocal chords have the capability to learn and sing harmony, because statistics show that cases of amusia, or Tone Deafness, are quite seldom indeed. What I’m not yet grasping, is how does one come “harmony-equipped?” As someone who was singing at the age of three, I cannot recall how I began to form harmonies; main problem being that it must have been before I could remember. I never came to properly read music and understand chordal structure until after High School. It was always solely “by ear”…and thus we come to the crux of my dilemma: Is harmony innate? Is it like absolute pitch, where one simply “has it” and though others may work for years to finally achieve relative pitch, they still fall necessarily short of the natural inclination?